Posted on

Using unusual character sets

Some people have reported problems with Relevanssi and non-English characters, mostly accented letters. The problem here isn’t with Relevanssi, which handles UTF-8 characters without problems (if you’re not using Unicode, but some other character set, you may indeed be out of luck).

The issue lies with MySQL. If you’re having troubles, try switching the collation on the ‘term’ field in the Relevanssi main table (typically ‘wp_relevanssi’) to ‘utf8_general_ci’ (or some other utf8 collation that suits you better). Re-index, and things should work better.

  • Moises Kirsch

    Does this means that if I have a word like Mónica and I search Monica (withouth the accent) would Relevanssi will find it?

    • Correct.

      • Moises Kirsch

        Hi Mikko,

        For me that is not working… you can take a look at http://www.tuytuboda.com/

        At the top you can see that there is a link called “Anúnciate”.

        If you search for “Anúnciate” you’ll get one result. But if you search for “Anunciate” you won’t get that page as a result.

        • Well, Relevanssi doesn’t really do anything about this, it’s actually a MySQL feature, so it probably depends on your database settings (database column collation). It works on my blog, I have ‘latin1_swedish_ci’ collation. It works also with ‘utf8_general_ci’, so you could try that.

  • Moises

    According to phpMyAdmin is ‘utf8_general_ci’:


    — Table structure for table `wp_relevanssi`

    CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `wp_relevanssi` (
    `id` mediumint(9) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    `doc` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
    `term` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
    `tf` mediumint(9) NOT NULL,
    `title` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    UNIQUE KEY `id` (`id`),
    KEY `doc` (`doc`),
    KEY `term` (`term`)
    ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=1859 ;

    Any other ideas?

  • Amir

    Hi,

    The highlighting functionality doesn’t work with Hebrew characters. The relevant results are returned fine in Hebrew but unlike the ones in English, they are not highlighted for some reason. I modified the collation on the ‘term’ field but the problem remains. Any ideas?

    Many thanks,

    Amir

    • “Uncheck this if you use non-ASCII characters” – have you unchecked that option? If that doesn’t help, I don’t know what will. Probably a problem with how the highlighting regexp handles Hebrew characters. Unfortunately I don’t know how to fix that.

  • Amir

    Problem solved! thanks a lot! 🙂

  • Luis

    hi, first of all good plugin which has solving us a lot of probs but know we have realized that because our site is in Spain=) indexing is not working propertly with the ñ and the accent letters. We have tryed to change in the wp_relevanssi table the term collate, but not working. Any idea how to fix it? should be the table complete ALTER instead of the field?.

    • I once tried the whole Polish alphabet on my test blog and it worked fine. I just checked using ñ, and no problems. So, Relevanssi is Unicode compatible, but there’s something in your setup that isn’t… So try to meddle around in the MySQL collation settings, both on table and field level.

      • Luis

        finally it worked, there was sometihng weird when all data was massively added to the DB, so sorry my fault, the plug works perfectly with the ñ of España =).
        But now i am facing something weird too, i was using a faceted search and now it is not working any longer because two warning are being prompt in the implode function. any idea what could be changed in the search module?

  • What kind of faceted search? What kind of implode errors? Relevanssi changes everything in the search module, there’s nothing left of original Relevanssi search =) So, if you’re using some other search plugin, yes, it’s most likely going to break down.

    • Luis

      jejej i supposed it, indexing everything should bring down the basic wp search module; it works, as i told you, perfect, but i am getting crazy trying to fix the new prob….
      Let me explain you how it worked just in case you had any idea (would be great) ; the search function sent to the old search module all the query to perform the post search, eg,
      function smart_query($effective_array)
      {
      global $wpdb;
      $query = ‘SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT * ‘;
      $queryfrom = ‘FROM ‘.$wpdb->posts;
      $querywhere = ” WHERE post_type = ‘post’ AND post_status = ‘publish’ AND (“;
      $querywhere_array = array();

      //loop through all selected terms and build the ‘where’ query fragment corresponding to that term
      foreach ($effective_array as $id)
      {
      $querywhere_array[$id] = ‘(ID in (SELECT tr’.$id.’.object_id FROM ‘.$wpdb->term_relationships.’ tr’.$id.’, ‘.$wpdb->term_taxonomy.’ tt’.$id.’ WHERE tt’.$id.’.term_id =’.$id.’ AND tr’.$id.’.term_taxonomy_id = tt’.$id.’.term_taxonomy_id)’;
      […..and keep constructing the query with the descendants, i wont post it in oreder not to make it imposible to read……]

      return ($query);
      }//function smart_query

      function facetedsearch_request_filter($input)
      {
      if ( isset ($_REQUEST[‘strm’][0]) && isset($_REQUEST[‘facetedsearch’]) && $_REQUEST[‘facetedsearch’] == 1)
      {
      return smart_query($input);//search with all categories selected
      }
      else if ( isset ($_REQUEST[‘strm2’][0]) && isset($_REQUEST[‘facetedsearch’]) && $_REQUEST[‘facetedsearch’] == 2)
      {
      return search_tags($input);
      }
      return($input);
      } //function facetedsearch_request_filter

      add_filter(‘posts_request’,’facetedsearch_request_filter’);//add the filter

      And it is weird because results are becomen from the DB, (i know cuz i have a header slider and it is being updated (!????) with the post which accomplish the query).
      And also the warning messages:
      Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /var/www/kk2/wp-content/plugins/role-scoper/relevanssi-helper-front_rs.php on line 31

      Warning: implode() [function.implode]: Invalid arguments passed in /var/www/kk2/wp-content/plugins/role-scoper/relevanssi-helper-front_rs.php on line 31

      As i said thanks for your help.

  • Those implode warnings are coming from Role Scoper. No idea why, it works just fine when I tried it. Don’t know what’s up with your faceted search.

    • Luis

      I though t it but check what is in the function, supposed to be role-scoper =)
      valid_stati = array_merge( get_post_stati( array( ‘public’ => true ) ), get_post_stati( array( ‘private’ => true ) ) );

      remove_filter( ‘relevanssi_post_ok’, ‘relevanssi_default_post_ok’ );
      add_filter( ‘relevanssi_post_ok’, array( &$this, ‘relevanssi_post_ok’ ) );
      add_filter( ‘relevanssi_results’, array( &$this, ‘relevanssi_log_results’ ) );
      }

      function relevanssi_log_results( $arr ) {

      //echo “Array qk le llegaa”.$arr; die();

      $this->relevanssi_results = $arr;

      global $wpdb;

      $id_clause = “AND ID IN( ‘” . implode( “‘,'”, array_keys($arr) ) . “‘)”;
      $results = $wpdb->get_results( “SELECT ID, post_name, post_type, post_status, post_author, post_parent FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE 1=1 $id_clause” );

      foreach( $results as $row ) {
      wp_cache_add( $row->ID, $row, ‘posts’ );
      }

      return $arr;
      }

      function relevanssi_post_ok($doc) {
      static $set_listed_ids = false;

      if ( ! $set_listed_ids ) {
      $set_listed_ids = true;
      $GLOBALS[‘scoper’]->listed_ids[‘post’] = array_fill_keys( array_keys($this->relevanssi_results), true );
      }

      if ( function_exists(‘relevanssi_s2member_level’) ) {
      if ( relevanssi_s2member_level($doc) == 0 ) return false; // back compat with relevanssi_default_post_ok, in case somebody is also running s2member
      }

      $status = relevanssi_get_post_status($doc);

      if ( in_array( $status, $this->valid_stati ) )
      $post_ok = current_user_can( ‘read_post’, $doc );
      else
      $post_ok = false;

      return $post_ok;
      }
      }
      ?>

  • Yes, that is the Relevanssi compatibility code from Role-Scoper. It’s still Role-Scoper code.

  • Luis

    Mikko just a question, what has been changed in posts_request filter?

  • Relevanssi doesn’t use posts_request filter in any way.

  • Luis

    Dont tell me that :_( jeje
    i am trying to understand why performing the query, the results (even paged) are showed in an slider i have in the header (i have to select which ones to show) instead of showing them in the “normal” way, just in the body, and getting the results as 0 found.

  • Luis

    i have tryed the site unistalling the relevanssi and faceted search works again. could it be something with the form submit and how your plug works?? cuz i have checked whne i am clicking a search button, a lot of fields are sent.

  • Luis

    this is what the submit sent.
    http://test/kk2/index.php?s=facetedsearch&searchmode=2&paged=0&datepickerInicial=&datepickerFinal=&vs[0]=1&tx[3]=0&vs[3]=0&tx[11]=3&vs[11]=0&tx[48]=11&tx[49]=11&tx[50]=11&tx[54]=11&tx[51]=11&tx[56]=11&tx[53]=11&tx[52]=11&tx[55]=11&tx[10]=3&vs[10]=0&tx[74]=10&tx[9]=3&vs[9]=0&tx[63]=9&tx[62]=9&tx[8]=3&vs[8]=0&tx[64]=8&tx[12]=3&vs[12]=0&tx[66]=12&tx[70]=12&tx[69]=12&tx[68]=12&tx[67]=12&tx[13]=3&vs[13]=0&tx[28]=13&tx[30]=13&tx[27]=13&tx[29]=13&tx[16]=3&vs[16]=0&tx[58]=16&tx[57]=16&tx[59]=16&tx[60]=16&tx[15]=3&vs[15]=0&tx[72]=15&tx[71]=15&tx[14]=3&vs[14]=0&tx[24]=14&tx[7]=3&vs[7]=0&tx[61]=7&tx[6]=3&vs[6]=0&tx[46]=6&tx[47]=6&tx[45]=6&tx[23]=3&vs[23]=0&tx[31]=23&tx[32]=23&tx[33]=23&tx[22]=3&vs[22]=0&tx[44]=22&tx[43]=22&tx[42]=22&tx[21]=3&vs[21]=0&tx[65]=21&tx[20]=3&vs[20]=0&tx[73]=20&tx[231]=3&tx[18]=3&vs[18]=0&tx[26]=18&tx[5]=3&vs[5]=0&tx[39]=5&tx[38]=5&tx[41]=5&tx[40]=5&tx[4]=3&vs[4]=0&tx[37]=4&tx[34]=4&tx[35]=4&tx[36]=4&tx[17]=3&vs[17]=0&tx[75]=17&tx[19]=3&vs[19]=0&tx[25]=19&tx[76]=0&vs[76]=0&tx[243]=76&vs[243]=0&tx[88]=243&vs[88]=0&tx[114]=88&tx[117]=88&tx[89]=243&vs[89]=0&tx[116]=89&tx[98]=243&tx[79]=76&vs[79]=0&tx[103]=79&tx[104]=79&vs[104]=0&tx[109]=104&tx[110]=104&tx[78]=76&vs[78]=0&tx[93]=78&tx[94]=78&tx[96]=78&tx[95]=78&tx[92]=78&tx[91]=78&tx[100]=78&vs[100]=0&tx[115]=100&tx[99]=78&tx[97]=78&tx[90]=78&tx[102]=78&tx[77]=76&vs[77]=0&tx[86]=77&vs[86]=0&tx[135]=86&tx[128]=86&tx[131]=86&tx[134]=86&tx[133]=86&tx[132]=86&tx[129]=86&tx[130]=86&tx[127]=86&tx[81]=77&tx[85]=77&vs[85]=0&tx[123]=85&tx[119]=85&tx[118]=85&tx[126]=85&tx[121]=85&tx[125]=85&tx[120]=85&tx[122]=85&tx[124]=85&tx[84]=77&vs[84]=0&tx[112]=84&tx[111]=84&tx[113]=84&tx[82]=77&vs[82]=0&tx[163]=82&tx[162]=82&tx[161]=82&tx[164]=82&tx[165]=82&tx[149]=82&tx[150]=82&tx[166]=82&tx[160]=82&tx[159]=82&tx[154]=82&tx[155]=82&tx[156]=82&tx[153]=82&tx[152]=82&tx[158]=82&tx[151]=82&tx[157]=82&tx[83]=77&tx[87]=77&vs[87]=0&tx[143]=87&tx[142]=87&tx[145]=87&tx[147]=87&tx[146]=87&tx[141]=87&tx[140]=87&tx[148]=87&tx[138]=87&tx[136]=87&tx[137]=87&tx[139]=87&tx[144]=87&tx[80]=76&vs[80]=0&tx[106]=80&tx[107]=80&tx[108]=80&tx[101]=80&tx[105]=80&strm[]=245&tx[245]=0&tx[246]=0&tx[1]=0&facetedsearch=1

  • Hello,

    When I’m using my site logged in, the search engine finds and highlights words with accentuated characters (like décision). Works fine.

    However, if I use the site as any normal visitor would (not logged in) words with accentuated characters (like décision), the results are nil. Broken.

    Any ideas?

    Gen

    • That’s odd, support for accentuated characters should be a WordPress default feature.

      • If you send me your email address, I can give you a user ID to view this yourself.